South carolina teaching standards there is a defined a set of professional indicators, known as the instructional rubrics, to measure teaching skills, knowledge, and responsibilities of the. Performance definitions are provided at levels 5, 3, and 1, but raters can also score performance at levels 2 or 4 based on their professional. Niet tap teaching standards rubric the tap teaching standards rubric is divided into four domains. A working group of education stakeholders from across the state identified the niet teaching standards 4. Based on nationally normed, researchbased standards, niet s rubric clearly defines effective teaching and fosters collaboration around a common language and vision that correlates with student achievement.
Instruction tiger niet rubric crosswalk version page 2. And now, its connected to the adobe document cloud. Ties together hypothesis and evidence well shows deep understanding about how the sources differ from each other and of the audience for each source. Text size, type, and color do not support the message and content or are distracting. All learning objectives and state content standards are explicitly communicated. Niet s teaching standards rubric, currently used by eight states, brings a comprehensive focus on four key domains. Components of the rubric are weighted in three categories. A comprehensive rubric has been developed to measure teachers performance in each of those indicators. Writing 1920 points 12, 1618 points 10, 1215 points 7, 811 points 4 67 points 02, 5 points 00 writing evaluation excellent 4 pts good 3 pts average 2 pts needs improvement 1 pts context aand structure excelnt main idea and context of paper is made clear in first paragraph. Institute for excellence in teaching niet teaching standards 4. Tabsdividers for each film present and clearly labeled.
Access a list of public rubrics made by our members. Consistently connected to what students previously learned known from life experience integrated with other disciplines. This is a sample rubric for teachers to assess students oral presentations. Significantly above expectations 5 at expectations 3 significantly below expectations 1 standards and objectives. District infrastructure level 1 maintenance of a non ccss led system level 2. Explanation of taps teaching skills, knowledge and. Judging criteria judging criteria are explained in the contest rule book evaluation historical quality 60% entry is historically accurate shows analysis and interpretation places topic in historical context shows wide research uses available primary sources research is balanced relation to theme 20%. Bookmark rubrics for future use build, share, exchange, and reuse rubrics. Within each domain, performance indicators are listed with bulleted descriptors and a rubric specifying three performance levels for measuring actual teacher performance. A comprehensive rubric has been developed to measure teachers performance in each of those. Illinois state board of education district rubric for a standards based. Drawing rubric 912th grades projects worth 100 points each assignment description. National history day performance project rubric presentation concept 1 2 3 4 thesis presence thesis is not present in the performance thesis is present, but is. With over two decades of ontheground experience impacting 275,000 educators and 2.
Extremely evident instructional design score comments the course organization and design is clear, coherent, and presented in a developmentally appropriate way. Summary rubric community center for teaching excellence. Adobe acrobat reader dc software is the free global standard for reliably viewing, printing, and commenting on pdf documents. Niet has defined a set of professional indicators, known as the instructional rubrics, to measure teaching skills, knowledge, and responsibilities of the teachers in a school. Instruction tiger model for teacher evaluation 1st release. Subobjectives are aligned and logically sequenced to. Its the only pdf viewer that can open and interact with all types of pdf content, including. Role of the tap evaluation and compensation guide the tap evaluation and compensation tec guide provides schools with a framework and instruments to implement taps instructionally focused accountability and performancebased compensation systems. Summary rubric element exceeds 5 meets 4 approaches 3 fails 1 content demonstrates mastery in identifying the main ideas and supporting ideas of a complex text. The speaker provides a variety of types of content appropriate for the task, such as generalizations, details, examples and various forms of. Population to be served 30 points population to be. The speaker provides a variety of types of content appropriate for the task, such as generalizations, details, examples and various forms of evidence.
This rubric will help you know exactly what i am expecting to find in an essay. Ideas are fresh and original different than ive done in the past. Niet instructional rubric significantly above expectations 5 at expectations 3 significantly below expectations 1 standards and objectives the lessons major objective. Rubistar is a tool to help the teacher who wants to use rubrics, but does not have the time to develop them from scratch. Many of our schools share their rubrics on our community site for other campuses to use. Criteria excellent good below average ineffective total. The idea for my story is clearly defined and fully supported.
Explanation of taps teaching skills, knowledge and responsibilities performance standards introduction to measure teaching skills, knowledge and responsibilities, tap has defined a set of professional indicators required of all tap teachers. Subobjectives are aligned and logically sequenced to the lessons major objective. Voice quality is clear and consistently audible through some of the book trailer. You have identified the authors purpose point of view from this story, though your explanation was too specific to this one story, andor not generalized enough to apply to other stories, probably you just need to revise the theme statement a bit to be more concise.
Here you can also find a few that we consider best practice based on their use or design. This rubric is designed to be integrated into a scoring sheet. Raters can score performance at levels 2 or 4 based on their professional judgment. Ideascontent relevant, telling details go beyond the obvious. Three domains are shown in the overview below, the fourth domain will be either the niet responsibilities survey or professionalism. Presentation 1920 points 12, 1618 points 10, 1215 points 7, 811 points 4 67 points 02, 5 points 00 presentation scoring excellent 4 pts good 3 pts average 2 pts needs improvement 1 pts introduction excelnt in a convincing manner. Voice quality is clear and consistently audible throughout the majority of the book trailer. It is essential that all teachers in a tap school develop an indepth understanding of teaching expectations as well as how.
Our resource library provides teachers, school leaders and policymakers valuable insights to support effective teaching for improved student outcomes. Book trailer rubric category 4 3 2 1 voice consistency voice quality is clear and consistently audible throughout the book trailer. Adobe acrobat reader dc download free pdf viewer for. Environment expectations managing student behavior. Niet national institute for excellence in teaching. National history day performance project rubric presentation. Examples of best practice rubrics baseline help center. Niets work, impacting more than 275,000 educators and 2. Digital curriculum evaluation rubric curriculum evaluation rubric score each item as follows. No scribbling or doodling on the binder or on your note pages or on readings pages.